Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Viewpoints on InnovationViewpoints on Innovation
VS
EY-ParthenonEY-Parthenon
Viewpoints on Innovation

Viewpoints on Innovation

N/A

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.viewpointsoninnovation.com
768/1000Fair

Welcome to Viewpoints on Innovation. Inspiration, discussion, advice, and resources for innovation leaders to maximize the value of innovation initiatives.

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
EY-Parthenon

EY-Parthenon

1 More London Place, London, SE1 2AF, GB

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ey.com/parthenon
785/1000Fair

Our unique combination of transformative strategy, transactions and corporate finance delivers real-world value – solutions that work in practice, not just on paper. Benefiting from EY’s full spectrum of services, we’ve reimagined strategic consulting to work in a worl...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:18,222
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Viewpoints on Innovation

Viewpoints on Innovation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EY-Parthenon

EY-Parthenon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Viewpoints on Innovation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EY-Parthenon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Viewpoints on Innovation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Viewpoints on Innovation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EY-Parthenon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EY-Parthenon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Viewpoints on Innovation

Viewpoints on Innovation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
EY-Parthenon

EY-Parthenon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation company and EY-Parthenon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation and EY-Parthenon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation and EY-Parthenon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Viewpoints on Innovation or EY-Parthenon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Viewpoints on Innovation or EY-Parthenon ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation and EY-Parthenon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Viewpoints on Innovation and EY-Parthenon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES