Comparison Overview
Victor Lighting

Victor Lighting
PO Box 5571, Glasgow, G52 9AH, GB
Last Update: 24/11/2025
Victor Lighting manufacturers a unique range of luminaires specifically designed for hazardous area lighting for use in high risk areas where potentially explosive gases and dusts may exist. Our distinctive lighting solutions are characterised by low maintenance design ...

Signify
High Tech Campus 48, Eindhoven, North Brabant, NL, 5656 AE
Last Update: 12/09/2026
Signify (Euronext: LIGHT Signify is the world leader in lighting for professionals and consumers. We unlock the extraordinary potential of light for brighter lives and a better world. Our global portfolio of brands deliver advanced products, connected systems and servic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Victor Lighting







Signify






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Victor Lighting in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Signify in 2026.
Incident History - Victor Lighting (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Victor Lighting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Signify (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Signify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Victor Lighting

Signify
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.
The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.
An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.
A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.