Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Viajes Falabella PerúViajes Falabella Perú
VS
Carnival Cruise LineCarnival Cruise Line
Viajes Falabella Perú

Viajes Falabella Perú

undefined, San Borja, Lima, 15036, PE

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

Somos parte de la Asociación Internacional de Transporte Aéreo (IATA). Buscamos hacer posible las aspiraciones de las personas, mejorar su calidad de vida y superar sus expectativas a través de una oferta integrada de servicios, potenciada por los beneficios de Viajes F...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:28
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Carnival Cruise Line

Carnival Cruise Line

3655 NW 87th Avenue, Miami, Florida, US, 33178

Last Update: 01/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://jobs.carnival.com/
662/1000Weak

Since our founding in 1972, Carnival Cruise Line — "The World’s Most Popular Cruise Line®” — carries millions of passengers every year. We offer a fun and unique career destination for a wide range of professionals in Marketing, IT, Accounting/Audit, Finance, Marine Ope...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:27,173
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Viajes Falabella Perú

Viajes Falabella Perú

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Carnival Cruise Line

Carnival Cruise Line

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Viajes Falabella Perú in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

Carnival Cruise Line has 92.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Viajes Falabella Perú (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Viajes Falabella Perú cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Carnival Cruise Line (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carnival Cruise Line cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Viajes Falabella Perú

Viajes Falabella Perú

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Carnival Cruise Line

Carnival Cruise Line

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAR1780295181
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAR1780325760
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CAR327092125

FAQ

Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú company and Carnival Cruise Line company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú and Carnival Cruise Line, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú and Carnival Cruise Line, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Viajes Falabella Perú or Carnival Cruise Line ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Viajes Falabella Perú or Carnival Cruise Line ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú and Carnival Cruise Line, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Viajes Falabella Perú and Carnival Cruise Line, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1