Comparison Overview
Via Credit Union

Via Credit Union
4505 S. Adams St., Marion, 46953, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Via Credit Union was formed in 1936 by a group of school teachers and administrators with 38 members, less than $100 in assets and was operated out of the home of the volunteer Treasurer until 1965. Today, ViaCU serves nearly 40,000 members in 12 counties, has assets ov...

Franklin Templeton
1 Franklin Pkwy, San Mateo, 94403, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Franklin Resources, Inc. [NYSE:BEN] is a global investment management organization with subsidiaries operating as Franklin Templeton (www.franklinresources.com). The products, services, information and materials referenced in this site may not be available to resident...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Via Credit Union







Franklin Templeton






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Via Credit Union in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Franklin Templeton in 2026.
Incident History - Via Credit Union (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Via Credit Union cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Franklin Templeton (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Franklin Templeton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Via Credit Union

Franklin Templeton
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
DocsGPT through 0.20.0 posts OAuth connector session tokens to a wildcard target origin in the callback-status endpoint without validating sender origin. Attackers can obtain session tokens and provider account emails by acting as window.opener during OAuth authorization, then use tokens to disconnect victims' cloud storage connectors.
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/docsgpt/api/connector/routes.py#L344-L366
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/docsgpt/api/connector/routes.py#L515-L527
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/frontend/src/components/ConnectorAuth.tsx#L57-L80
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/issues/2766
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/docsgpt-through-0.20.0-oauth-token-disclosure-via-wildcard-postmessage
DevSpace through 6.3.21 fails to reject parent-directory segments in tar entry names from the in-pod sync stream. Attackers operating a malicious container can stream tar entries with traversal sequences to write arbitrary files on the developer workstation, enabling code execution.
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/blob/7f272dcf90653fa9b42bc4347f7f3f9a52b0e8b5/pkg/devspace/sync/tar.go#L68-L82
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/blob/7f272dcf90653fa9b42bc4347f7f3f9a52b0e8b5/pkg/devspace/sync/util.go#L9-L11
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/issues/3290
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/devspace-through-6.3.21-path-traversal-via-tar-extraction
Refly through 1.1.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /v1/misc/scrape endpoint that fetches caller-supplied URLs without validating the scheme, host, or resolved address. Authenticated attackers can make the backend issue requests to loopback, private, and link-local addresses including cloud metadata services to read page titles and descriptions of internal resources.
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/blob/77fb0ca184251bba7380cbac2dbdf7a6c9944652/apps/api/src/modules/misc/misc.controller.ts#L38-L43
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/blob/77fb0ca184251bba7380cbac2dbdf7a6c9944652/packages/utils/src/scrape-weblink.ts
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/issues/2280
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/refly-through-1.1.0-server-side-request-forgery-via-scrape-endpoint
GrowthBook through 5.0.1 returns unredacted fact table definitions including raw warehouse SQL in payloads served by unauthenticated public report and experiment endpoints. Attackers with knowledge of a publicly shared report or experiment identifier can read internal data warehouse query text, schema, table names, filter values and datasource identifiers.
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/blob/57d07471b137eb43d9bfb1613d0a1203d21fef88/packages/back-end/src/app.ts#L391-L409
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/blob/57d07471b137eb43d9bfb1613d0a1203d21fef88/packages/back-end/src/services/reports.ts#L880-L890
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/issues/6541
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/growthbook-through-5.0.1-information-disclosure-via-public-endpoints
Flowable flowable-engine through 8.0.0 contains an XML external entity injection vulnerability in ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.parseXml() that fails to disable external entity resolution when parsing deployed BPMN resources. Attackers with process deployment privileges can embed DOCTYPE declarations with external entities in BPMN files to read arbitrary local files or trigger requests to internal network endpoints when diagram layout is computed.
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/blob/0779d68e5a3385b74d8acb8bc37901ff54513249/modules/flowable-engine/src/main/java/org/flowable/engine/impl/bpmn/diagram/ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.java#L101-L118
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/blob/0779d68e5a3385b74d8acb8bc37901ff54513249/modules/flowable5-engine/src/main/java/org/activiti/engine/impl/bpmn/diagram/ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.java#L97-L114
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/issues/4216
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/flowable-flowable-engine-through-8.0.0-xxe-via-processdiagramlayoutfactory