Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Vi Customer CareVi Customer Care
VS
MTS GroupMTS Group
Vi Customer Care

Vi Customer Care

undefined, Mumbai, Maharastra, 400030, IN

Last Update: 28/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.myvi.in/
751/1000Fair

Vodafone Idea Limited is an Aditya Birla Group and Vodafone Group partnership. It is India’s leading telecom service provider. The Company provides pan India Voice and Data services across 2G, 3G and 4G platform. With the large spectrum portfolio to support the growing ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:37
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MTS Group

MTS Group

Moscow, RU

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mts.ru
769/1000Fair

Mobile TeleSystems OJSC ("MTS") is the leading telecommunications group in Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia, offering mobile and fixed voice, broadband, pay TV as well as content and entertainment services in one of the world's fastest growing regions. Including ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:10,694
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Vi Customer Care

Vi Customer Care

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MTS Group

MTS Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vi Customer Care in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MTS Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Vi Customer Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vi Customer Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MTS Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MTS Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Vi Customer Care

Vi Customer Care

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MTS Group

MTS Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Vi Customer Care company and MTS Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Vi Customer Care and MTS Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Vi Customer Care and MTS Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Vi Customer Care or MTS Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Vi Customer Care or MTS Group ?
Between Vi Customer Care and MTS Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Vi Customer Care and MTS Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3