Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VerismaVerisma
VS
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterVanderbilt University Medical Center
Verisma

Verisma

1750 Founders Pkwy Ste 130, Alpharetta, 30009, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.verisma.com
714/1000Moderate

Verisma, trusted by 20,000+ clients across 50 states, is redefining how healthcare organizations manage and use health data – ensuring it’s trusted, secure and actionable for real-time, high-stakes decision making. Our lifecycle-driven approach prioritizes health data i...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:622
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

2525 West End Ave., Ste. 500, Nashville, 37203, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
787/1000Fair

From specializing in transplants and pediatric cancer to solving undiagnosed diseases, we know solving the most complex problems prepares us to solve any problem. We are committed to excellence in patient care, research, and medical education and training. We thrive on ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:20,987
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Verisma

Verisma

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Verisma in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vanderbilt University Medical Center in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Verisma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Verisma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vanderbilt University Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vanderbilt University Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Verisma

Verisma

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VER444072625
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Verisma company and Vanderbilt University Medical Center company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Verisma and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Verisma and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Verisma or Vanderbilt University Medical Center ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Verisma or Vanderbilt University Medical Center ?
Between Verisma and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Verisma and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2