Comparison Overview
Verifone
Verifone
New York, NY, US
Last Update: 03/04/2026
The world’s leading brands trust Verifone for global payments. We power the boundless payments grid for merchants, fintech companies, and financial institutions worldwide. By combining a flexible payments platform comprised of devices, applications, services, acquiring ...
Fidelity Investments
245 Summer St, Boston, 02210, US
Last Update: 12/09/2026
Fidelity’s mission is to strengthen the financial well-being of our customers and deliver better outcomes for the clients and businesses we serve. Fidelity’s strength comes from the scale of our diversified, market-leading financial services businesses that serve indivi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Verifone
Fidelity Investments
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Verifone has 42.53% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Fidelity Investments has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Verifone (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Verifone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Fidelity Investments (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fidelity Investments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Verifone
Fidelity Investments
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.