Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Veracyte, Inc.Veracyte, Inc.
VS
Charles River LaboratoriesCharles River Laboratories
Veracyte, Inc.

Veracyte, Inc.

6000 Shoreline Court, South San Francisco, 94080, US

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.veracyte.com
735/1000Moderate

Veracyte is a global diagnostics company that empowers clinicians with the high-value insights they need to guide and assure patients at pivotal moments in the race to diagnose and treat cancer. Our growing menu of diagnostic tests answers important clinical questions...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:681
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Charles River Laboratories

Charles River Laboratories

251 Ballardvale Street, Wilmington, Massachusetts, US, 01887

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://criver.com
776/1000Fair

At Charles River, we are guided by our strong purpose—to create healthier lives—which centers around the patients who rely on the therapeutics we help to develop, the animals in our care, to our planet, and to the passionate and skilled people who are at the heart of ou...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:14,867
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Veracyte, Inc.

Veracyte, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Charles River Laboratories

Charles River Laboratories

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Veracyte, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles River Laboratories in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Veracyte, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Veracyte, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Charles River Laboratories (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles River Laboratories cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Veracyte, Inc.

Veracyte, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VER200072925
Charles River Laboratories

Charles River Laboratories

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. and Charles River Laboratories, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. and Charles River Laboratories, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Veracyte, Inc. or Charles River Laboratories ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Veracyte, Inc. or Charles River Laboratories ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. and Charles River Laboratories, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Veracyte, Inc. and Charles River Laboratories, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA