Comparison Overview

Veolia | Water Tech

VS

WM

Veolia | Water Tech

30, Rue Madeleine Vionnet, Aubervilliers, Île-de-France, FR, 93300
Last Update: 2025-12-12

As the world leader in water technologies and services, Veolia relies on its 17,500 water technology experts to deliver innovative solutions that drive both performance and sustainability, without compromise. With over 4,400 technology patents and serving more than 14,000 customers worldwide, Veolia’s water technology activities generated 4.97 billion euros in revenue in 2024. These solutions are central to Veolia’s GreenUp strategic plan, accelerating the ecological transformation of cities and industries while safeguarding resources for the future

NAICS: 54162
NAICS Definition: Environmental Consulting Services
Employees: 12,473
Subsidiaries: 70
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

WM

800 Capitol St, Suite 3000, Houston, Texas, US, 77002
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849

WM is North America's leading provider of integrated environmental solutions. We partner with our customers and communities to manage and reduce waste from collection to disposal while recovering valuable resources and creating clean, renewable energy. We are on a quest for environmental performance, a mission to maximize resource value, while minimizing – and even eliminating – environmental impact so that both our economy and our environment can thrive. WM tailors its services to meet the needs of each customer group and to ensure consistent, superior service at the local level. Headquartered in Houston, the company serves nearly 20 million municipal, commercial, industrial, and residential customers through a network of 367 collection operations, 355 transfer stations, 273 active landfill disposal sites, 16 waste-to-energy plants, 104 recycling plants, and 111 beneficial-use landfill gas projects.

NAICS: 54162
NAICS Definition: Environmental Consulting Services
Employees: 26,374
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veolia-water-tech.jpeg
Veolia | Water Tech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/waste-management.jpeg
WM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Veolia | Water Tech
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Veolia | Water Tech in 2025.

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WM in 2025.

Incident History — Veolia | Water Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Veolia | Water Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veolia-water-tech.jpeg
Veolia | Water Tech
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/waste-management.jpeg
WM
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

WM company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Veolia | Water Tech company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, WM company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Veolia | Water Tech company.

In the current year, WM company and Veolia | Water Tech company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WM company nor Veolia | Water Tech company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither WM company nor Veolia | Water Tech company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither WM company nor Veolia | Water Tech company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Veolia | Water Tech company nor WM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Veolia | Water Tech nor WM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Veolia | Water Tech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to WM company.

WM company employs more people globally than Veolia | Water Tech company, reflecting its scale as a Environmental Services.

Neither Veolia | Water Tech nor WM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Veolia | Water Tech nor WM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Veolia | Water Tech nor WM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Veolia | Water Tech nor WM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Veolia | Water Tech nor WM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Veolia | Water Tech nor WM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N