Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VentureLab by Lund UniversityVentureLab by Lund University
VS
DeloitteDeloitte
VentureLab by Lund University

VentureLab by Lund University

Scheelevägen 15, Lund, Skåne, 223 63, SE

Last Update: 20/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.venturelab.lu.se
748/1000Moderate

VentureLab is part of Lunds University and help students to realize ideas. We offer inspirational activities, business development and run Lund University's incubator - all for free. We work to spark an interest for entrepreneurship among students and to help student...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:7
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Deloitte

Deloitte

Worldwide, Worldwide, OO

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.deloitte.com/
808/1000Good

Deloitte drives progress. Our firms around the world help clients become leaders wherever they choose to compete. Deloitte invests in outstanding people of diverse talents and backgrounds and empowers them to achieve more than they could elsewhere. Our work combines adv...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:516,523
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VentureLab by Lund University

VentureLab by Lund University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Deloitte

Deloitte

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VentureLab by Lund University in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Deloitte has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - VentureLab by Lund University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VentureLab by Lund University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Deloitte (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deloitte cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VentureLab by Lund University

VentureLab by Lund University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Deloitte

Deloitte

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIT1781000708
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AQU1774671948
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DEL3932939091625

FAQ

Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University company and Deloitte company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University and Deloitte, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University and Deloitte, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VentureLab by Lund University or Deloitte ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VentureLab by Lund University or Deloitte ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University and Deloitte, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VentureLab by Lund University and Deloitte, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8