Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VDL Automated Vehicles BV.VDL Automated Vehicles BV.
VS
AramexAramex
VDL Automated Vehicles BV.

VDL Automated Vehicles BV.

Terheijdenseweg 169, Breda, 4825BJ, NL

Last Update: 25/12/2025

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

This is the official VDL Automated Vehicles BV. LinkedIn company page. VDL Groep has a strong automotive orientation and is already in automated transport solutions since 2001. VDL started to develop its first Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) in 2009. To professional...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:31
Subsidiaries:77
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aramex

Aramex

Dubai Logistics City, Dubai, AE, 3841

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aramex.com
792/1000Fair

Founded in 1982, Aramex has emerged as a global leader in logistics and transportation, renowned for its innovative services tailored to businesses and consumers. As a listed company on the Dubai Financial Market (since 2005) and headquartered in the UAE, our strategic ...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:20,257
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VDL Automated Vehicles BV.

VDL Automated Vehicles BV.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aramex

Aramex

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VDL Automated Vehicles BV. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aramex in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - VDL Automated Vehicles BV. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VDL Automated Vehicles BV. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aramex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aramex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VDL Automated Vehicles BV.

VDL Automated Vehicles BV.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aramex

Aramex

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. company and Aramex company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. and Aramex, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. and Aramex, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VDL Automated Vehicles BV. or Aramex ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VDL Automated Vehicles BV. or Aramex ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. and Aramex, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VDL Automated Vehicles BV. and Aramex, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2