Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VDL Hapro B.V.VDL Hapro B.V.
VS
Philip Morris InternationalPhilip Morris International
VDL Hapro B.V.

VDL Hapro B.V.

Fleerbosseweg 33, KAPELLE, 4421RR, NL

Last Update: 27/10/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.vdlhapro.com/
761/1000Fair

VDL Hapro bv is a Dutch manufacturer of sunbeds and car roof boxes. The highest standard in design, technology and an innovative mentality is combined with the prosperity of expertise, loyalty and commitment of all employees of the company. This results in a leading pos...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:77
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Philip Morris International

Philip Morris International

Avenue de Rhodanie 50, Lausanne, CH, 1007

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.pmi.com/
843/1000Good

Philip Morris International (PMI) is a leading international consumer goods company working to deliver a smoke-free future and evolving its portfolio for the long term to include products outside of the tobacco and nicotine sector. Since 2008, PMI has invested more than...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:65,038
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VDL Hapro B.V.

VDL Hapro B.V.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Philip Morris International

Philip Morris International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VDL Hapro B.V. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philip Morris International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - VDL Hapro B.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VDL Hapro B.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Philip Morris International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philip Morris International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VDL Hapro B.V.

VDL Hapro B.V.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Philip Morris International

Philip Morris International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. company and Philip Morris International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. and Philip Morris International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. and Philip Morris International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VDL Hapro B.V. or Philip Morris International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VDL Hapro B.V. or Philip Morris International ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. and Philip Morris International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VDL Hapro B.V. and Philip Morris International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8