Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VDL GereedschapmakerijVDL Gereedschapmakerij
VS
DanfossDanfoss
VDL Gereedschapmakerij

VDL Gereedschapmakerij

Industrieweg 29, Hapert, 5527 AJ, NL

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
744/1000Moderate

VDL Gereedschapmakerij is specialist in productiegereedschappen voor metalen producten: van prototype tooling voor kleine series tot high volume productietooling. Verder heeft VDL Gereedschapmakerij zich ontwikkeld tot fabrikant van enkel stuks tot middelgrote series fi...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:24
Subsidiaries:77
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Danfoss

Danfoss

Nordborgvej 81, Nordborg, DK, 6430

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.danfoss.com
777/1000Fair

Danfoss engineers solutions that increase machine productivity, reduce emissions, lower energy consumption, and enable electrification. Our solutions are used in such areas as refrigeration, air conditioning, heating, power conversion, motor control, industrial machine...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:22,778
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VDL Gereedschapmakerij

VDL Gereedschapmakerij

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danfoss

Danfoss

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VDL Gereedschapmakerij in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Danfoss has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - VDL Gereedschapmakerij (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VDL Gereedschapmakerij cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danfoss (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danfoss cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VDL Gereedschapmakerij

VDL Gereedschapmakerij

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Danfoss

Danfoss

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
REJDANDAN1774492078

FAQ

Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij company and Danfoss company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij and Danfoss, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij and Danfoss, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VDL Gereedschapmakerij or Danfoss ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VDL Gereedschapmakerij or Danfoss ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij and Danfoss, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VDL Gereedschapmakerij and Danfoss, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2