Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VASS BENELUXVASS BENELUX
VS
IBMIBM
VASS BENELUX

VASS BENELUX

11, rue des 3 Cantons, Windhof, L-8399, LU

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://vasscompany.com/
750/1000Fair

VASS drives business value creation through strategic end-to-end digital transformation projects, combining business, technology, data, and AI solutions. We help our clients face today’s challenges while also providing them with a long-term strategic and competitive vis...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:66
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IBM

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US

Last Update: 13/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ibm.com
373/1000Critical

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:336,062
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
10
Known data breaches
15
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VASS BENELUX

VASS BENELUX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IBM

IBM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VASS BENELUX in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

IBM has 870.87% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - VASS BENELUX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VASS BENELUX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VASS BENELUX

VASS BENELUX

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IBM

IBM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1786584530
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1785357547
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1785321873

FAQ

Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VASS BENELUX company and IBM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VASS BENELUX and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VASS BENELUX and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VASS BENELUX or IBM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VASS BENELUX or IBM ?
Between VASS BENELUX and IBM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VASS BENELUX and IBM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES