Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITEDVARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED
VS
The HEINEKEN CompanyThe HEINEKEN Company
VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED

VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED

Plot No. 31, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana, IN, 122002

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://varunbeverages.com/
797/1000Fair

Varun Beverages Limited (VBL) is one of the top FMCG players in the Indian Market. We are on track towards strengthening our position in the global beverage industry with our presence in 14 countries in the Indian sub-continent and Africa - where we are responsible for ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:11,508
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The HEINEKEN Company

The HEINEKEN Company

Tweede Weteringsplantsoen 21, 1017 ZD, Amsterdam, NL

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
796/1000Fair

HEINEKEN - the world's most international brewer. It is the leading developer and marketer of premium beer and cider brands. Led by the Heineken® brand, the Group has a portfolio of more than 500 international, regional, local, and speciality beers and ciders. We are co...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:42,812
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED

VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The HEINEKEN Company

The HEINEKEN Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The HEINEKEN Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The HEINEKEN Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The HEINEKEN Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED

VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The HEINEKEN Company

The HEINEKEN Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HEI513080425

FAQ

Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED and The HEINEKEN Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED and The HEINEKEN Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED or The HEINEKEN Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED or The HEINEKEN Company ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED and The HEINEKEN Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED and The HEINEKEN Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA