Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla HandelslagOsuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag
VS
Hallmark CardsHallmark Cards
Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag

Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag

Teknobulevardi 3-5, Vantaa, 01530, FI

Last Update: 12/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vbo.fi
770/1000Fair

Varuboden-Oslan historia on vielä lyhyt, aloittihan osuuskauppa toimintansa kombinaatiofuusion myötä vasta niinkin äskettäin kuin 1.7.2011. Molemmilla fuusion osapuolilla, Osuuskunta Varubodenilla ja Osuuskauppa Oslalla, on kuitenkin tahoillaan pitkät ja vaiheikkaat his...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:176
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hallmark Cards

Hallmark Cards

2501 McGee, Kansas City, 64108, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
533/1000Critical

Hallmark believes if you care enough you can change the world as we work to help create a more emotionally connected world in every life, every day. Founded in 1910 by a teenage entrepreneur with two shoe boxes of postcards under his arm, Hallmark today is still famil...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:17,415
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag

Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hallmark Cards

Hallmark Cards

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Hallmark Cards has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hallmark Cards (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hallmark Cards cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag

Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hallmark Cards

Hallmark Cards

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
INDPITCARBASZARHAL1777466463
🔒 Incident : Breach
SALHAL1775967850
🔒 Incident : Breach
MCGSUBAMTADTHALPANCARBET1785169886

FAQ

Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag company and Hallmark Cards company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag and Hallmark Cards, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag and Hallmark Cards, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag or Hallmark Cards ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag or Hallmark Cards ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag and Hallmark Cards, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Osuuskauppa Varuboden-Osla Handelslag and Hallmark Cards, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93740
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93739
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-75885
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93894
SUMMARY

In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:A/V:D/RE:L/U:Clear
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-93738
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1