Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Varex Imaging CorporationVarex Imaging Corporation
VS
StrykerStryker
Varex Imaging Corporation

Varex Imaging Corporation

1678 S Pioneer Rd, Salt Lake City, 84104, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Our Mission: Through the talent of our people and vision of customers, we help improve and save lives throughout the world by making the invisible visible. Our Vision: To be the preferred global partner for innovative x-ray imaging solutions. Varex Imaging Corporation...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:1,275
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Stryker

Stryker

2825 Airview Boulevard, Kalamazoo, MI, US, 49002

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.stryker.com
502/1000Critical

Stryker is a global leader in medical technologies and, together with our customers, we are driven to make healthcare better. We offer innovative products and services in MedSurg, Neurotechnology and Orthopaedics that help improve patient and healthcare outcomes. Alongs...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:50,225
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
15
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Varex Imaging Corporation

Varex Imaging Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stryker

Stryker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Varex Imaging Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Stryker has 1315.09% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Varex Imaging Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Varex Imaging Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stryker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stryker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Varex Imaging Corporation

Varex Imaging Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
VAR1765562990
Stryker

Stryker

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FORCISTELLEXSALCHAIVACAROPESTR1782226177
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1779337852
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1779452900

FAQ

Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation company and Stryker company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Varex Imaging Corporation or Stryker ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Varex Imaging Corporation or Stryker ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation and Stryker, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Varex Imaging Corporation and Stryker, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA