Comparison Overview
VARDA FASHION GROUP

VARDA FASHION GROUP
225 Mesogion Avenue, Athens, undefined, 11525, GR
Last Update: 08/12/2025
The VARDAS FASHION GROUP is involved in the trade of men’s and women’s apparel & footwear in wholesale and retail corporate franchised and licensed distribution. It was founded in 1939 and today operates under the corporate brand name ‘’VARDAS’’ and the retail licensed ...

Rumah
Centro, Balneário Camboriú, BR
Last Update: 07/09/2026
Fundada em Junho de 2015, a Rumah é uma loja online especializada em artigos de decoração e itens para a casa, entregando seus produtos para o Brasil inteiro. Com um portfólio grande e variado, a Rumah proporciona diversas opções para seus clientes em várias categorias....
Compliance Ranges Comparison

VARDA FASHION GROUP







Rumah






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VARDA FASHION GROUP in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Rumah in 2026.
Incident History - VARDA FASHION GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VARDA FASHION GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Rumah (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rumah cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

VARDA FASHION GROUP

Rumah
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.