Comparison Overview
Van Egmond Groep

Van Egmond Groep
Expeditieweg 4, Doetinchem, 7007CM, NL
Last Update: 04/03/2026
Van Egmond Groep is een groep bedrijven, gericht op het leveren van goederen en diensten op het gebied van elektrotechniek en industriële automatisering. Ons motto: Wij voegen iets toe! Van Egmond Elektrogroothandel BV Ruim 70 jaar is Van Egmond Elektrogroothandel ...

Fastenal
2001 Theurer Blvd, Winona, MN, US, 55987
Last Update: 02/04/2026
By providing three things – truly local service, the world’s largest vending program, and unmatched inventory management – Fastenal saves your business time and money. Who are Fastenal's customers? • Organizations wanting to strengthen their supply chains. • Business...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Van Egmond Groep







Fastenal






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Van Egmond Groep in 2026.
Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fastenal in 2026.
Incident History - Van Egmond Groep (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Van Egmond Groep cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Fastenal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fastenal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Van Egmond Groep

Fastenal
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.