Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Van Wingerden Intl IncVan Wingerden Intl Inc
VS
Syngenta GroupSyngenta Group
Van Wingerden Intl Inc

Van Wingerden Intl Inc

4112 Haywood Rd, Horse Shoe, North Carolina, US, 28742-9740

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
729/1000Moderate

NAICS:111
NAICS Definition:Crop Production
Employees:18
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Syngenta Group

Syngenta Group

Rosentalstrasse 67, Basel, 4002, CH

Last Update: 02/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.syngentagroup.com
703/1000Moderate

To help feed 10 billion people while reducing emissions and improve biodiversity. This is our mission as the global agriculture technology leader. With over 56,000 employees in more than 90 countries and hundreds of thousands of agricultural partners worldwide, we are c...

NAICS:111
NAICS Definition:Crop Production
Employees:39,751
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Van Wingerden Intl Inc

Van Wingerden Intl Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Syngenta Group

Syngenta Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Farming Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Van Wingerden Intl Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Farming Industry Avg (This Year)

Syngenta Group has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Van Wingerden Intl Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Van Wingerden Intl Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Syngenta Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Syngenta Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Van Wingerden Intl Inc

Van Wingerden Intl Inc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VAN810072725
Syngenta Group

Syngenta Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CHESYN1780417682

FAQ

Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc company and Syngenta Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc and Syngenta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc and Syngenta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Van Wingerden Intl Inc or Syngenta Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Van Wingerden Intl Inc or Syngenta Group ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc and Syngenta Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Van Wingerden Intl Inc and Syngenta Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA