Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Van den Udenhout GroepVan den Udenhout Groep
VS
BYDBYD
Van den Udenhout Groep

Van den Udenhout Groep

Balkweg 1 's-Hertogenbosch, Noord-Brabant 5232 BT, NL

Last Update: 27/10/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.udenhout.nl
749/1000Moderate

Uw Audi, Volkswagen, Volkswagen bedrijfswagen, SEAT & ŠKODA dealer in de regio 's-Hertogenbosch, Oss, Son, Eindhoven, Helmond, Veldhoven en Veghel. Volg ons via LinkedIn om op de hoogte te blijven van de ontwikkelingen, evenementen en acties. Bij Van den Udenhout st...

NAICS:336
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:501-1,000
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BYD

BYD

No.3009, BYD Road, Pingshan, Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN, 518118

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bydglobal.com
825/1000Good

Established in 1995, BYD is a top high-tech enterprise in China specializing in IT, automobile, and new energy.BYD is the largest supplier of rechargeable batteries in the globe, and has the largest market share for Nickel-cadmium batteries, handset Li-ion batteries, ce...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:24,942
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Van den Udenhout Groep

Van den Udenhout Groep

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BYD

BYD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Van den Udenhout Groep in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

BYD has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Van den Udenhout Groep (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Van den Udenhout Groep cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BYD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BYD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Van den Udenhout Groep

Van den Udenhout Groep

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BYD

BYD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
BYD1789993911

FAQ

Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep company and BYD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep and BYD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep and BYD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Van den Udenhout Groep or BYD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Van den Udenhout Groep or BYD ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep and BYD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Van den Udenhout Groep and BYD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2