Comparison Overview

University of Waterloo

VS

Columbia University

University of Waterloo

200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, CA, N2L 3G1
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://http://uwaterloo.ca/

University of Waterloo is a leader in innovation that drives economic and social prosperity for Canada and the world. We are home to a renowned talent pipeline, game-changing research and technology, and unmatched entrepreneurial culture, that together create solutions to tackle today’s and tomorrow’s challenges. Our greatest impact happens together. A strategic integration of research and teaching excellence, the world’s largest co-operative education program, entrepreneurship-intensive programs, and creator-owned IP, has resulted in extensive industry collaboration, the generation of thousands of commercial and social enterprises, and a dynamic learning experience for more than 41,000 undergraduate and graduate students.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,421
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Columbia University

West 116 Street and Broadway, New York, NY, US, 10027
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 750 and 799
http://columbia.edu

For more than 250 years, Columbia has been a leader in higher education in the nation and around the world. At the core of our wide range of academic inquiry is the commitment to attract and engage the best minds in pursuit of greater human understanding, pioneering new discoveries and service to society.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 23,329
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uwaterloo.jpeg
University of Waterloo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/columbia-university.jpeg
Columbia University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Waterloo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Columbia University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Waterloo in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

Columbia University has 50.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — University of Waterloo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Waterloo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Columbia University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Columbia University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uwaterloo.jpeg
University of Waterloo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/columbia-university.jpeg
Columbia University
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (Phone-based Phishing)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Waterloo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Columbia University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Columbia University company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Waterloo company has not reported any.

In the current year, Columbia University company has reported more cyber incidents than University of Waterloo company.

Neither Columbia University company nor University of Waterloo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Columbia University company has disclosed at least one data breach, while University of Waterloo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Columbia University company nor University of Waterloo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Waterloo company nor Columbia University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Waterloo nor Columbia University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Waterloo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Columbia University company.

Columbia University company employs more people globally than University of Waterloo company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Waterloo nor Columbia University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Waterloo nor Columbia University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Waterloo nor Columbia University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Waterloo nor Columbia University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Waterloo nor Columbia University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Waterloo nor Columbia University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References