Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UW–Madison Division of Continuing StudiesUW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies
VS
UC San DiegoUC San Diego
UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies

UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies

21 N. Park Street, Madison, 53715, US

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dcs.wisc.edu/
770/1000Fair

The Division of Continuing Studies supports the mission of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the spirit of the Wisconsin Idea by providing access to educational resources to nontraditional students, lifelong learners, and the community. The division's primary r...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:79
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UC San Diego

UC San Diego

9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, US, 92093

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://ucsd.edu
807/1000Good

Recognized as one of the top 15 research universities worldwide, our culture of collaboration sparks discoveries that advance society and drive economic impact. Everything we do is dedicated to ensuring our students have the opportunity to become changemakers, equipped ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:21,889
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies

UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UC San Diego

UC San Diego

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UC San Diego in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UC San Diego (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UC San Diego cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies

UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UC San Diego

UC San Diego

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies company and UC San Diego company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies and UC San Diego, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies and UC San Diego, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies or UC San Diego ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies or UC San Diego ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies and UC San Diego, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UW–Madison Division of Continuing Studies and UC San Diego, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1