Comparison Overview
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering - University of Waterloo

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering - University of Waterloo
200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, N2L 3G1, CA
Last Update: 01/03/2026
Welcome to one of the largest and most well-respected civil and environmental engineering departments in Canada. With 830 students enrolled in our undergraduate degree programs for architectural, civil, environmental and geological engineering, and 180 students in our ...

Ferrovial
Amsterdam, NL
Last Update: 04/10/2026
Ferrovial is a leading global infrastructure company transforming highways, airports, and energy around the world. Its distinctive integrated business model supports the entire lifecycle of complex projects, from design and financing to construction, operation and maint...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering - University of Waterloo







Ferrovial






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering - University of Waterloo in 2026.
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ferrovial in 2026.
Incident History - Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering - University of Waterloo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering - University of Waterloo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ferrovial (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ferrovial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering - University of Waterloo

Ferrovial
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.