Comparison Overview
UvA - Executive Master of Finance & Control

UvA - Executive Master of Finance & Control
Plantage Muidergracht 12, Amsterdam, 1018, NL
Last Update: 29/11/2025
Met de Executive Master of Finance & Control verdiep je jouw kennis van finance en accounting. Daarnaast krijg je inzicht in flankerende kennisgebieden op het gebied van strategie, operations, recht, data en technologie, zodat je optimaal kunt bijdragen aan de business....

Synchrony
HQ, Stamford, Connecticut, US, 06902
Last Update: 01/04/2026
At Synchrony, our driving force is to be essential to people's everyday lives by making it easier for the many millions of people who rely on us to access their essential needs and everyday wants with consumer financing that works for them – from their first credit card...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UvA - Executive Master of Finance & Control







Synchrony






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UvA - Executive Master of Finance & Control in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Synchrony in 2026.
Incident History - UvA - Executive Master of Finance & Control (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UvA - Executive Master of Finance & Control cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Synchrony (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Synchrony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UvA - Executive Master of Finance & Control

Synchrony
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security vulnerability has been detected in adafap api-mcp up to 92b9a5d04acfec165c7d4ef852496593aa87be06. This affects the function customAxios of the file app/api/proxy/route.ts of the component Proxy API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A weakness has been identified in PhialsBasement KoboldCPP-MCP-Server 1.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function makeRequest of the file src/index.ts of the component BaseConfigSchema. Executing a manipulation of the argument apiUrl can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A security flaw has been discovered in Handwriting-OCR handwriting-ocr-mcp-server 0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fs.readFileSync of the file src/index.ts of the component upload_document. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in path traversal. Attacking locally is a requirement. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was identified in Nikolaibibo claude-comfyui-mcp 1.0.0. Affected is the function copyFileSync of the file src/tools/utils.ts of the component comfy_upload_image. Such manipulation of the argument image_path leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.