Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der RechtsgeleerdheidUniversiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid
VS
UNSWUNSW
Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid

Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid

Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, Amsterdam, 1018 WV, NL

Last Update: 01/02/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

At the Amsterdam Law School, we take a committed and open-minded look at the role and place of law in a (international) society that is constantly changing. With over 5,000 students and 600 staff, we are one of the larger law faculties in the Netherlands. We train lawye...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:98
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UNSW

UNSW

Gate 9, High St Kensington 2052, Sydney, New South Wales (NSW), AU, 2052

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.unsw.edu.au/
807/1000Good

The University of New South Wales (UNSW) is one of Australia's leading research and teaching universities. Established in 1949, UNSW has expanded rapidly and now has more than 52,000 students, including more than 14,000 international students from over 130 different c...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:17,425
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid

Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UNSW

UNSW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNSW in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UNSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid

Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UNSW

UNSW

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid company and UNSW company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid and UNSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid and UNSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid or UNSW ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid or UNSW ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid and UNSW, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Universiteit van Amsterdam - Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid and UNSW, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA