Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UUNETUUNET
VS
OYOOYO
UUNET

UUNET

US

Last Update: 14/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uu.net
777/1000Fair

UUNET founded in 1987 and based in Northern Virginia was the first commercial Internet service provider. Today, UUNET is an internal brand of Verizon Business (formerly MCI).

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:36
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
OYO

OYO

9th Floor, Spaze Palazo,Sourthern Peripheral Road Sector-69, Gurugram, 122001, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.oyorooms.com
811/1000Good

OYO is a global platform that aims to empower entrepreneurs and small businesses with hotels and homes by providing full-stack technology products and services that aims to increase revenue and ease operations; bringing easy-to-book, affordable, and trusted accommodatio...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:15,342
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UUNET

UUNET

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
OYO

OYO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

UUNET has 37.5% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OYO in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UUNET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UUNET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - OYO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OYO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UUNET

UUNET

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LUMATTVERFBIWINFIN1772764213
OYO

OYO

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UUNET company and OYO company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UUNET and OYO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UUNET and OYO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UUNET or OYO ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UUNET or OYO ?
Between UUNET and OYO, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UUNET and OYO, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-47238
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-45418
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #132, any authenticated user who can upload videos can add multiple subtitles from different files and change their title (English, Spanish...). The POST /actions/subtitle_edit.php request used to change their title includes a number parameter which is vulnerable to SQL Injection. A boolean-based blind SQL injection can be used to exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #132.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45060
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #129, the actions/progress_video.php endpoint is vulnerable to blind SQL injection. Any unauthenticated user can exploit the ids parameter to execute SQL queries and exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #129.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42846
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #140, ClipBucket's Remote Play feature allows any authenticated user to add a video by importing an external URL as the source. Some shell commands are run with the URL as a parameter. The URL is concatenated directly into shell commands without escaping then executed, so any shell metacharacter in the URL is interpreted. This results in arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #140.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-6250
SUMMARY

An authenticated format string vulnerability exists in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 due to improper handling of user-controlled input.  Externally controlled data is interpreted as a format string, which can be used to manipulate stack memory, including control flow data such as return addresses. A remote authenticated attacker may redirect execution flow to existing internal functions, triggering an unauthorized factory reset, leading to loss of configuration, deletion of stored credentials and service disruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA