Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain InstituteUT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute
VS
Ochsner HealthOchsner Health
UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute

UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute

5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, Texas, 75390-8823, US

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile

One of the greatest challenges of our time is brain disease and injury and UT Southwestern Medical Center is meeting that challenge head on with the Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute. The Institute is a comprehensive center dedicated to better understanding the basic ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ochsner Health

Ochsner Health

1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, Louisiana, US, 70121

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
784/1000Fair

Ochsner Health is the leading nonprofit healthcare provider in Louisiana, Mississippi and across the Gulf South, delivering expert care at its 47 hospitals and more than 370 health and urgent care centers. Ochsner is nationally recognized for inspiring healthier lives...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:17,501
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute

UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ochsner Health

Ochsner Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ochsner Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ochsner Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ochsner Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute

UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ochsner Health

Ochsner Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute company and Ochsner Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute and Ochsner Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute and Ochsner Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute or Ochsner Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute or Ochsner Health ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute and Ochsner Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UT Southwestern O'Donnell Brain Institute and Ochsner Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3