Comparison Overview
UTS Impact Studios

UTS Impact Studios
N/A
Last Update: 30/12/2025
We are a podcast and digital production house based at UTS. We work with academics, researchers, philanthropists, companies and knowledge workers to tell stories that have the power to effect real change. Our team brings together a rich array of storytelling creativity ...

Carnegie Mellon University
5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, 15213, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Carnegie Mellon University founder Andrew Carnegie said: "My heart is in the work." No statement better captures the passion and drive of our people to make a real difference. At Carnegie Mellon, we're not afraid of the work. Our educational environment creat...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UTS Impact Studios







Carnegie Mellon University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UTS Impact Studios in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Carnegie Mellon University in 2026.
Incident History - UTS Impact Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UTS Impact Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Carnegie Mellon University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Carnegie Mellon University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UTS Impact Studios

Carnegie Mellon University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.