Comparison Overview
The University of Texas Medical Branch

The University of Texas Medical Branch
301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas, US, 77550
Last Update: 06/09/2026
The first academic health center in Texas opened its doors in 1891 and today has four campuses, five health sciences schools, seven institutes for advanced study, a research enterprise that includes one of only two national laboratories dedicated to the safe study of in...

Corewell Health
N/A
Last Update: 10/08/2026
People are at the heart of everything we do, and the inspiration for our legacy of outstanding outcomes, innovation, strong community partnerships, philanthropy and transparency. Corewell Health is a not-for-profit health system that provides health care and coverage wi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

The University of Texas Medical Branch







Corewell Health






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The University of Texas Medical Branch in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Corewell Health has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - The University of Texas Medical Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The University of Texas Medical Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Corewell Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Corewell Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

The University of Texas Medical Branch

Corewell Health
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.