Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The University of Texas Medical BranchThe University of Texas Medical Branch
VS
Corewell HealthCorewell Health
The University of Texas Medical Branch

The University of Texas Medical Branch

301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas, US, 77550

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://utmb.jobs
780/1000Fair

The first academic health center in Texas opened its doors in 1891 and today has four campuses, five health sciences schools, seven institutes for advanced study, a research enterprise that includes one of only two national laboratories dedicated to the safe study of in...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,743
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Corewell Health

Corewell Health

N/A

Last Update: 10/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://corewellhealth.org
488/1000Critical

People are at the heart of everything we do, and the inspiration for our legacy of outstanding outcomes, innovation, strong community partnerships, philanthropy and transparency. Corewell Health is a not-for-profit health system that provides health care and coverage wi...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:43,407
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The University of Texas Medical Branch

The University of Texas Medical Branch

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Corewell Health

Corewell Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Texas Medical Branch in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Corewell Health has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - The University of Texas Medical Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Texas Medical Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Corewell Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corewell Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The University of Texas Medical Branch

The University of Texas Medical Branch

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Corewell Health

Corewell Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
700TRACORMUN1786373838
🔒 Incident : Breach
OLECOR1774664850
🔒 Incident : Breach
HEACOR1774651954

FAQ

Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Corewell Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch and Corewell Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch and Corewell Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The University of Texas Medical Branch or Corewell Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The University of Texas Medical Branch or Corewell Health ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch and Corewell Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The University of Texas Medical Branch and Corewell Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9