Comparison Overview

Uticon
Beemdstraat 3, Eindhoven, 5653 MA, NL
Last Update: 02/04/2026
As a consultancy and engineering firm, Uticon is a strategic partner of the food industry in the Benelux and surrounding countries. We support our relationships from the initial ideas up to and including commissioning. We translate innovative technologies into practical...

Tata Technologies
25 Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjawadi, Pune, 411057, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We're a global product engineering and digital services company focused on fulfilling our mission of helping the world drive, fly, build, and farm by enabling our customers to realize better products and deliver better experiences. We’re the strategic engineering partne...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Uticon







Tata Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Uticon in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - Uticon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Uticon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Uticon

Tata Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Capgo (Cap-go/capgo) before 12.128.2 contains an improper access control vulnerability in the SECURITY DEFINER PostgREST RPC function public.record_build_time, which is granted to the anon role and callable with only the public Supabase publishable (sb_publishable_*) anon key. An unauthenticated attacker can insert rows into public.build_logs for arbitrary organizations and, because the function uses ON CONFLICT (build_id, org_id) DO UPDATE, can overwrite existing usage/billing records by reusing the same build_id for a target org. This enables cross-tenant tampering of billing build logs and financial-impact denial of service by inflating billable build time.
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication logic flaw that lets an attacker register and control an account bound to a victim's email address before that email is verified. By enabling two-factor authentication on the pre-registered account, the attacker gains control over the account claimed under the victim's identity, allowing them to read and modify its state and enforce organization-level policies, while the legitimate user is denied access to the account tied to their own email.
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a flaw in the Enforce Password Policy feature: after a Super Admin enables the policy and successfully changes their password to a compliant one, the backend does not update the password-compliance state. As a result, the backend continues to treat the account as non-compliant and repeatedly forces password-reset prompts, permanently locking the Super Admin out of organization access (organization lockout / denial of service) despite valid authentication.
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a cross-tenant authorization bypass vulnerability in PostgREST endpoints that allows org-scoped read API keys to access other tenants' webhook secrets and delivery logs. Attackers can query the webhooks and webhook_deliveries endpoints to exfiltrate HMAC signing secrets and delivery payloads, enabling forged webhook events against victim organizations.
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in OTP verification that allows attackers to bypass email verification by modifying server responses. Attackers can intercept OTP verification requests and manipulate HTTP responses to falsely mark verification successful, enabling unauthorized 2FA enablement and account takeover.