Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Utah State Board of EducationUtah State Board of Education
VS
GEMS EducationGEMS Education
Utah State Board of Education

Utah State Board of Education

250 S 500 E, Salt Lake City, US

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://schools.utah.gov/
689/1000Weak

Our offices are home to several components in Utah Public Education: - Digital Teaching and Learning - Student Advocacy Services - Assessment and Accountability - Career and Technical Education - Charter Schools - Child Nutrition Programs - Data and Statistics - Financ...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:437
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
GEMS Education

GEMS Education

GEMS Education Building, Sheikh Zayed Road, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, AE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
786/1000Fair

GEMS Education is one of the world’s leading private K-12 education providers, educating over 200,000 students from 176+ nationalities across its global network of owned and managed schools. With nearly half a million alumni, GEMS has built a legacy of impact that spans...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:15,878
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Utah State Board of Education

Utah State Board of Education

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GEMS Education

GEMS Education

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

Utah State Board of Education has 44.75% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GEMS Education in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Utah State Board of Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Utah State Board of Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GEMS Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GEMS Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Utah State Board of Education

Utah State Board of Education

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UTA1778204107
GEMS Education

GEMS Education

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GEM23267522

FAQ

Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and GEMS Education company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Utah State Board of Education and GEMS Education, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Utah State Board of Education and GEMS Education, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Utah State Board of Education or GEMS Education ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Utah State Board of Education or GEMS Education ?
Between Utah State Board of Education and GEMS Education, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Utah State Board of Education and GEMS Education, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2