Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Utah State Board of EducationUtah State Board of Education
VS
Clark County School DistrictClark County School District
Utah State Board of Education

Utah State Board of Education

250 S 500 E, Salt Lake City, US

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://schools.utah.gov/
689/1000Weak

Our offices are home to several components in Utah Public Education: - Digital Teaching and Learning - Student Advocacy Services - Assessment and Accountability - Career and Technical Education - Charter Schools - Child Nutrition Programs - Data and Statistics - Financ...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:437
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Clark County School District

Clark County School District

Clark County School District, Las Vegas, 89121, US

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
732/1000Moderate

The Clark County School District is the 5th largest school district in the nation with over 300,000 students in 357 schools and over 40,000 employees. Our focus is on people – the educators, staff, students and parents who make our community one of the most diverse an...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:23,267
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Utah State Board of Education

Utah State Board of Education

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Clark County School District

Clark County School District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

Utah State Board of Education has 48.72% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

Clark County School District has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Utah State Board of Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Utah State Board of Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Clark County School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clark County School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Utah State Board of Education

Utah State Board of Education

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UTA1778204107
Clark County School District

Clark County School District

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CLANEV1778215759
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CLA105072425

FAQ

Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Utah State Board of Education company and Clark County School District company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Utah State Board of Education and Clark County School District, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Utah State Board of Education and Clark County School District, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Utah State Board of Education or Clark County School District ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Utah State Board of Education or Clark County School District ?
Between Utah State Board of Education and Clark County School District, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Utah State Board of Education and Clark County School District, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA