Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

USP - Universidade de São PauloUSP - Universidade de São Paulo
VS
Brigham Young UniversityBrigham Young University
USP - Universidade de São Paulo

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

Rua da Reitoria, 109, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 05508-900

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.usp.br/
818/1000Good

A Universidade de São Paulo (USP) é uma universidade pública, mantida pelo Estado de São Paulo e ligada à Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Econômico, Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (SDECTI). O talento e dedicação dos docentes, alunos e funcionários têm sido reconhecidos po...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:22,604
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Brigham Young University

Brigham Young University

Main Campus, Provo, UT, US, 84602

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://byu.edu
800/1000Good

We believe a world yearning for hope and joy needs the graduates of Brigham Young University—disciples of Jesus Christ who are driven by love for God and His children and who are prepared to serve and lead. This preparation demands a unique university model: at BYU, bel...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:16,614
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
USP - Universidade de São Paulo

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Brigham Young University

Brigham Young University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USP - Universidade de São Paulo in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brigham Young University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - USP - Universidade de São Paulo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USP - Universidade de São Paulo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Brigham Young University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brigham Young University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
USP - Universidade de São Paulo

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Brigham Young University

Brigham Young University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
BRI21381123

FAQ

Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo company and Brigham Young University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo and Brigham Young University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo and Brigham Young University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - USP - Universidade de São Paulo or Brigham Young University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - USP - Universidade de São Paulo or Brigham Young University ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo and Brigham Young University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between USP - Universidade de São Paulo and Brigham Young University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1