Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. Embassy MadridU.S. Embassy Madrid
VS
Workingfor.beWorkingfor.be
U.S. Embassy Madrid

U.S. Embassy Madrid

Calle de Serrano, 75, Madrid, 28006, ES

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://es.usembassy.gov/
759/1000Fair

La Embajada de Estados Unidos en Madrid representa al gobierno de Estados Unidos en España y Andorra. España es un aliado y amigo indispensable, nos unen valores comunes y profundos lazos históricos y culturales. Estados Unidos y España trabajan en estrecha colaboración...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:68
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

Simon Bolivarlaan 30, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.workingfor.be
782/1000Fair

Workingfor.be is the job platform of the federal administration. Here, you will find a wide variety of jobs in different fields of profession. Every day thousands of our employees help build tomorrow's society. When you choose the federal administration, you choos...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,104
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. Embassy Madrid

U.S. Embassy Madrid

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Embassy Madrid in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workingfor.be in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. Embassy Madrid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Embassy Madrid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Workingfor.be (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workingfor.be cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. Embassy Madrid

U.S. Embassy Madrid

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid and Workingfor.be, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid and Workingfor.be, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. Embassy Madrid or Workingfor.be ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. Embassy Madrid or Workingfor.be ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid and Workingfor.be, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. Embassy Madrid and Workingfor.be, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA