Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

justice.gov

The mission of the Department of Justice (DOJ) is to uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights. Learn more about the Department and its mission at www.justice.gov/about


UDJ A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

UDJ
Company Information
Website:http://www.justice.gov
Employees number:24,809
Number of followers:369,430
NAICS:92212
Industry Type:Law Enforcement
Homepage:justice.gov
UDJ Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
logo
UDJLaw Enforcement
Updated:
27/08/2026
656/1000
Weak
B
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
UDJ Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
UDJLaw Enforcement
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

UDJ
UDJWeak
Current Score
656B (WEAK)
01000
8 incidents
-31.67 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
SEPTEMBER 2026
657Before Incident
AUGUST 2026
674Before Incident
Cyber Attack
26 Aug 2026UDJ
U.S. Department of Justice and HHS: US says Chinese-linked hackers attacked NASA, Senate, and gov’t agencies

US Disrupts China-Linked Hacking Operation Targeting Critical Infrastructure

656After Incident
CRITICAL-18
HHSUSD1787790978
US Disrupts China-Linked Hacking Operation Targeting Critical Infrastructure The U.S. Justice Department announced on Wednesday the disruption of a China-affiliated hacking operation that had targeted sensitive government and private sector networks since at least 2018. The operation dismantled two key hacking platforms, QScan and QTRouter, used to infiltrate internet-connected devices and obscure the origin of cyberattacks. The hackers, linked to Nanjing Xinjiuwei Network Technology Company, allegedly served clients including China’s Ministry of State Security and the People’s Liberation Army. Targets included the U.S. Department of Justice, NASA, the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Senate, and three Department of Energy laboratories, as well as the NIH, HHS, and a U.S. security-device manufacturer. Four unnamed companies in the U.S. and South Korea were also compromised. In August 2019, the group attempted but failed to breach NASA networks. By September 2024, they successfully infiltrated multiple U.S. agencies and private entities. The hackers used QScan to infect routers and other devices, then routed attacks through QTRouter, making intrusions appear to originate from unrelated locations delaying detection and attribution. While the domain seizures disrupt the group’s operations, officials caution that the threat may persist. The takedown is part of a broader U.S. effort to counter China-sponsored cyber espionage, which has repeatedly targeted government and corporate networks, including recent breaches of Congressional and telecom systems. Neither the Chinese embassy nor Nanjing Xinjiuwei has commented on the allegations.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber Espionage
MOTIVATION
EspionageState-sponsored cyber operations
IMPACT
Government networksPrivate sector networksOperational Impact: Delayed detection and attribution of cyberattacks
DATA BREACH
Sensitivity Of Data: Sensitive government and corporate data
JULY 2026
671Before Incident
JUNE 2026
662Before Incident
MAY 2026
660Before Incident
APRIL 2026
658Before Incident
MARCH 2026
671Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Mar 2026UDJ
FIFA, U.S. Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation: Iran-linked group claims hack of FBI drones, threatens World Cup, monitor says

Iran-Linked Hacker Group Claims FBI Drone Breach, Threatens World Cup Security

653After Incident
CRITICAL-18
FBIUSDFIF1781267103
Iran-Linked Hacker Group Claims FBI Drone Breach, Threatens World Cup Security An Iran-affiliated hacker group, Handala, has claimed responsibility for breaching FBI-operated drones, alleging access to surveillance footage, facial recognition data, and license plate scans used for counterterrorism. The group, monitored by the SITE Intelligence Group, stated it had infiltrated the drones "for months," capturing "every image and every suspect" from first-person view (FPV) drones deployed by the FBI. In a statement released Friday, Handala issued a veiled threat against the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which began Thursday, warning that "FPVs are everywhere" and could pose risks to teams and events. The FBI is using drones to secure World Cup venues, with flights banned over stadiums and fan zones to prevent unauthorized aircraft. The U.S. Justice Department had previously warned of potential cyber retaliation from Iranian actors following U.S.-Israeli strikes on Tehran in February, which escalated regional tensions. Handala has a history of cyber operations, including a March claim of hacking the email account of an FBI official and leaking personal photos. While Handala provided alleged evidence of the drone breach, SITE disputed the authenticity of the footage, identifying one video as promotional material from a U.S. police department’s 2024 tornado response demonstration. The U.S. State Department has offered a $10 million reward for information leading to the identification of the group’s members.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber Espionage, Data Breach, Threat
MOTIVATION
Cyber Retaliation, Disruption of Security Operations, Threat to Major Event (2026 FIFA World Cup)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Surveillance footage, facial recognition data, license plate scansSystems Affected: FBI-operated dronesOperational Impact: Potential compromise of counterterrorism surveillance and World Cup security operationsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to FBI and U.S. security agenciesIdentity Theft Risk: High (facial recognition and license plate data exposed)
DATA BREACH
Surveillance footageFacial recognition dataLicense plate scansSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: Alleged (claimed by threat actor)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (facial recognition and license plate data)
FEBRUARY 2026
728Before Incident
Breach
06 Feb 2026UDJ
U.S. Department of Justice: Epstein File Data Security Update: Raw Code Found in Emails

DOJ’s Incomplete Redaction of Epstein Files Exposes Sensitive Email Data

669After Incident
CRITICAL-59
USD1770409295
DOJ’s Incomplete Redaction of Epstein Files Exposes Sensitive Email Data A recent review of court-released files related to Jeffrey Epstein has revealed that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) failed to properly redact sensitive information, leaving raw email data exposed. The discovery was made by Mahmoud Al-Qudsi, founder of NeoSmart Technologies, who stumbled upon the issue while examining the documents. Al-Qudsi identified that some blacked-out sections contained base64-encoded email data a standard format for transmitting attachments over SMTP. Though the content appeared as indecipherable hex strings, cybersecurity experts and an online forensics community were able to decode and reconstruct portions of the emails. While not all files were recoverable, the incomplete redaction allowed access to information that was intended to remain confidential. The incident highlights a critical oversight in the DOJ’s handling of sensitive documents, raising concerns about the security of redacted legal filings.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Exposure
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive email dataBrand Reputation Impact: High (DOJ's handling of sensitive documents)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Email data (base64-encoded)Sensitivity Of Data: High (confidential legal filings)Data Exfiltration: Partial reconstruction by cybersecurity expertsData Encryption: Base64 encoding (not encryption)File Types Exposed: Email attachments
JANUARY 2026
727Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
726Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
725Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
724Before Incident
MARCH 2025
732Before Incident
Cyber Attack
03 Mar 2025UDJ
Cloudflare, U.S. Department of Justice and Social Security Administration: DOGE might have misused Social Security data, Trump administration admits

DOGE Employees Alleged Election Interference and Data Misuse

712After Incident
MEDIUM-20
CLOUSDSSA1769016836
DOGE Employees Under Scrutiny for Alleged Election Interference and Data Misuse The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has revealed in a court filing that members of Elon Musk’s "DOGE" team at the Social Security Administration (SSA) engaged in undisclosed communications with an unnamed advocacy group aiming to overturn election results in certain states. The interactions allegedly included a signed agreement that may have involved matching Social Security data with state voter rolls a potential violation of federal privacy laws. The DOGE employees have been referred for possible Hatch Act violations, which bars government officials from using their positions for political activities. According to DOJ officials, the advocacy group approached the SSA team with a request to analyze voter rolls for evidence of fraud, though the exact states targeted remain unspecified. Further concerns arose over the unauthorized use of third-party servers, including Cloudflare, to handle sensitive data contrary to a court ruling restricting access to such information. A senior adviser to Musk and the DOGE team, Steve Davis, was reportedly copied on a March 3, 2025, email containing a password-protected file with the private data of approximately 1,000 individuals from SSA systems. It remains unclear whether the data was accessed or exploited. The DOJ stated that no evidence suggests broader SSA awareness of the communications or the "Voter Data Agreement" beyond the involved DOGE members. The investigation is ongoing, with no further details on potential legal consequences or the advocacy group’s identity.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Misuse, Election Interference, Unauthorized Data Access
MOTIVATION
Political interference, Election fraud investigation
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Social Security data, Voter rolls, Private data of ~1,000 individualsSystems Affected: SSA systems, Third-party servers (Cloudflare)Operational Impact: Potential legal and regulatory scrutiny, Reputational damage to SSABrand Reputation Impact: High (SSA and DOGE team)Legal Liabilities: Potential Hatch Act violations, Privacy law violationsIdentity Theft Risk: High (exposure of private data)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Social Security data, Voter rolls, Personally identifiable information (PII)Number Of Records Exposed: ~1,000Sensitivity Of Data: HighData Encryption: Password-protected filePersonally Identifiable Information: Yes
MARCH 2023
758Before Incident
Breach
01 Mar 2023UDJ
U.S. Department of Justice and Social Security Administration: DOGE Employees Shared Social Security Data, Court Filing Shows

DOJ Corrects Record on Unauthorized Sharing of Sensitive Social Security Data

699After Incident
CRITICAL-59
USDSOC1768977122
DOJ Corrects Record on Unauthorized Sharing of Sensitive Social Security Data The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently filed a formal correction in a Maryland federal court, acknowledging that earlier statements by senior Social Security Administration (SSA) officials claiming that employees from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had their access to sensitive data revoked were false. The DOJ clarified that these officials did not know the statements were inaccurate at the time. The incident stems from March 2023, when DOGE employees detailed to the SSA shared sensitive government data via an unsecured third-party server, violating agency security protocols. The SSA remains uncertain about what specific data was exposed or whether it still exists on the server. The discrepancies came to light during an internal review last fall, with the SSA notifying the DOJ of its findings on December 10. The DOJ filed the corrections on January 16. The disclosure underscores ongoing tensions between career SSA officials and DOGE over data-sharing practices. Security experts warn that the unauthorized transfer of sensitive information risks broad exposure, with no clear record of who accessed the data or what was compromised. The incident highlights vulnerabilities in federal data handling amid interagency conflicts.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Interagency data-sharing conflicts
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive government dataBrand Reputation Impact: YesIdentity Theft Risk: Yes
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Sensitive government data, potentially including personally identifiable informationSensitivity Of Data: HighPersonally Identifiable Information: Potential
JANUARY 2017
673Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Jan 2017UDJ
U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation: Revelations from Epstein Files: Allegations of a “Personal Hacker”

Epstein’s Alleged Employment of a Personal Hacker

655After Incident
CRITICAL-18
FEDUSD1770208908
New DOJ Documents Reveal Epstein’s Alleged Ties to a "Personal Hacker" Recently unsealed Justice Department documents part of the so-called "Epstein Files" have exposed a previously undisclosed claim: in 2017, an FBI informant alleged that convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein employed a "personal hacker" within his inner circle. The revelation adds a cybersecurity dimension to the ongoing investigations into Epstein’s operations, though the hacker’s exact role remains unclear. The implications of such an association are significant. A personal hacker could have enabled Epstein to: - Gather sensitive information, including intercepted communications or private data. - Orchestrate security breaches, potentially targeting rivals or individuals seeking to expose his activities. - Manipulate digital evidence, possibly altering records to obscure his tracks. The FBI’s investigation into Epstein’s network now appears to extend beyond physical crimes into the digital realm, suggesting a level of sophistication that may have helped sustain his operations. The disclosure also raises broader concerns about the intersection of cybercrime and high-profile criminal enterprises, particularly regarding victim privacy and the role of digital forensics in modern investigations. As more details emerge, the alleged hacker’s involvement could provide critical insights into how Epstein maintained control over his network and how cyber tools may have been weaponized in support of his crimes. The case continues to underscore the growing importance of cybersecurity in uncovering and dismantling complex criminal organizations.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber Espionage, Data Manipulation
MOTIVATION
Information gathering, evidence manipulation, security breaches for operational control
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive communications, private data, potential digital evidenceOperational Impact: Potential obfuscation of criminal activities, victim privacy violationsLegal Liabilities: Potential obstruction of justice, privacy violationsIdentity Theft Risk: High (for victims and targets)
DATA BREACH
CommunicationsPrivate dataDigital evidenceSensitivity Of Data: HighPersonally Identifiable Information: Likely (victims, targets)
OCTOBER 2016
726Before Incident
Breach
14 Oct 2016UDJ
Department of Justice

California Department of Justice Data Breach

667After Incident
MEDIUM-59
USD846072725
The California Attorney General's Office reported a data breach on October 14, 2016, involving the inadvertent release of personal information, including names and identification numbers. The breach was discovered on October 17, 2016, and was reported on January 20, 2017. The number of individuals affected is unknown.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
namesidentification numbers
DATA BREACH
namesidentification numbers
FEBRUARY 2016
792Before Incident
Breach
01 Feb 2016UDJ
U.S. Department of Justice

Department of Justice Data Breach

716After Incident
CRITICAL-76
USD23616522
The Department of Justice suffered a security breach that compromised the personal information of 20,000 FBI employees. The hackers hacked into the database of the department and compromised information contained names, titles, phone numbers, and email addresses. The department investigated the incident along with law enforcement and deployed protection and defensive measures to safeguard information.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
namestitlesphone numbersemail addresses
DATA BREACH
personal informationSensitivity Of Data: Mediumnamestitlesphone numbersemail addresses

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for UDJ ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2026 ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on UDJ's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with UDJ ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view UDJ's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?