Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

USC Information Technology Services (ITS)USC Information Technology Services (ITS)
VS
CapgeminiCapgemini
USC Information Technology Services (ITS)

USC Information Technology Services (ITS)

1510 San Pablo St, Los Angeles, 90007, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://itservices.usc.edu/
732/1000Moderate

Bringing together a team of diverse and talented professionals, we provide the central IT services that support USC's schools, hospitals, research centers, and administrative units. Through the digital transformation initiatives we recently launched, we aim to develop a...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:119
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Capgemini

Capgemini

Place de l'Étoile, 11 rue de Tilsitt, Paris, France, FR, 75017

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.capgemini.com
792/1000Fair

Capgemini is an AI-powered global business and technology transformation partner, delivering tangible business value. We imagine the future of organizations and make it real with AI, technology and people. With our strong heritage of nearly 60 years, we are a responsibl...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:332,481
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
USC Information Technology Services (ITS)

USC Information Technology Services (ITS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Capgemini

Capgemini

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USC Information Technology Services (ITS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capgemini in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - USC Information Technology Services (ITS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USC Information Technology Services (ITS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Capgemini (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capgemini cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
USC Information Technology Services (ITS)

USC Information Technology Services (ITS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
USC117072825
Capgemini

Capgemini

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) company and Capgemini company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) and Capgemini, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) and Capgemini, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - USC Information Technology Services (ITS) or Capgemini ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - USC Information Technology Services (ITS) or Capgemini ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) and Capgemini, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between USC Information Technology Services (ITS) and Capgemini, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8