Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

USC Auxiliary ServicesUSC Auxiliary Services
VS
University of AucklandUniversity of Auckland
USC Auxiliary Services

USC Auxiliary Services

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90089, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://aux.usc.edu
769/1000Fair

USC Auxiliary Services, one of the largest divisions at the University of Southern California, is a dynamic organization comprised of six integral business units: USC Bookstores, USC Hospitality, USC Housing, USC Transportation, USC Hotel and the Los Angeles Memorial Co...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:159
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
University of Auckland

University of Auckland

Private Bag 92019, Auckland, NZ, 1142

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.auckland.ac.nz/
690/1000Weak

Waipapa Taumata Rau | University of Auckland is New Zealand’s largest and leading university. We celebrate our location in the beautiful harbour city of Auckland | Tamaki Makaurau, our unique position in Aotearoa New Zealand and our place within the Pacific.

 Our te ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,334
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
USC Auxiliary Services

USC Auxiliary Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Auckland

University of Auckland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USC Auxiliary Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

University of Auckland has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - USC Auxiliary Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USC Auxiliary Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Auckland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Auckland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
USC Auxiliary Services

USC Auxiliary Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
USC030090625
University of Auckland

University of Auckland

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UNISTAINSHAR1778200829

FAQ

Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services company and University of Auckland company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services and University of Auckland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services and University of Auckland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - USC Auxiliary Services or University of Auckland ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - USC Auxiliary Services or University of Auckland ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services and University of Auckland, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between USC Auxiliary Services and University of Auckland, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1