UTC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
UTC
Company Information
Website:http://www.ustranscom.mil/
Employees number:534
Number of followers:19,318
NAICS:92811
Industry Type:Armed Forces
Homepage:ustranscom.mil
UTC Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
UTCArmed Forces
Updated:
02/04/2026
02/04/2026
753/1000
Fair
Baa
UTC Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
UTCArmed Forces
Score locked

UTCFair
Current Score
753Baa (FAIR)
01000
1 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
753
MAY 2026
753
APRIL 2026
753
MARCH 2026
753
FEBRUARY 2026
753
JANUARY 2026
753
DECEMBER 2025
752
NOVEMBER 2025
752
OCTOBER 2025
752
SEPTEMBER 2025
752
AUGUST 2025
752
JULY 2025
752
JANUARY 2022
754
Cyber Attack
01 Jan 2022 • UTC
US Transportation Command: Russian hackers breach orgs to track aid routes to Ukraine
Russian State-Sponsored Cyberespionage Campaign by APT28 (Fancy Bear/Forest Blizzard)
737
CRITICAL-17
US-1765249605
Russian APT28 Cyberespionage Campaign Targets Aid Efforts to Ukraine
Since 2022, the Russian state-sponsored threat group APT28 (Fancy Bear/Forest Blizzard), linked to the GRU’s 85th GTsSS (military unit 26165), has conducted a sustained cyberespionage campaign against organizations supporting Ukraine. The operation, detailed in a joint advisory from 21 intelligence and cybersecurity agencies across nearly a dozen countries, targeted entities in defense, transportation, IT services, air traffic, and maritime sectors across 12 European nations and the U.S.
### Tactics and Techniques
APT28 employed a mix of stealthy intrusion methods, including:
- Password spraying and brute-force attacks
- Spear-phishing (credential theft and malware delivery)
- Exploitation of known vulnerabilities, such as:
- CVE-2023-23397 (Outlook NTLM relay)
- CVE-2023-38831 (WinRAR)
- Roundcube webmail flaws (CVE-2020-12641, CVE-2020-35730, CVE-2021-44026)
- SQL injection and VPN exploits against internet-facing infrastructure
To evade detection, the group routed communications through compromised small office/home office (SOHO) devices near targets. Once inside networks, they used native tools (PsExec, Impacket, RDP) and open-source utilities (Certipy, ADExplorer) for lateral movement and data exfiltration.
### Surveillance and Data Theft
APT28 prioritized compromising accounts with access to aid shipment details, including:
- Sender/recipient information
- Cargo contents and travel routes
- Container registration numbers
- Destination data
They also enrolled hijacked accounts in multi-factor authentication (MFA) to maintain persistent access. Among the malware used were the Headlace and Masepie backdoors, with data exfiltration methods tailored to each victim’s environment—often leveraging living-off-the-land (LOtL) techniques to avoid detection.
### Monitoring Aid Shipments via Compromised Cameras
A key aspect of the campaign involved hacking internet-connected cameras—including those at border crossings, military installations, rail stations, and traffic monitoring points—to track material movements into Ukraine. The advisory notes that over 10,000 cameras were targeted, with 80% in Ukraine and nearly 1,000 in Romania.
Google Threat Intelligence analyst John Hultquist warned that the group’s objectives extend beyond surveillance, aiming to disrupt aid efforts through cyber or physical means. The targeting of logistics and transportation networks suggests a broader strategy to undermine Ukraine’s supply chains.
### Impact and Scope
The campaign affected organizations in Bulgaria, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Moldova, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Ukraine, and the U.S. The advisory provides indicators of compromise (IoCs), including malicious scripts, threat actor-controlled email providers, and IP addresses linked to the attacks. While mitigation guidance was included, the report underscores the persistent and adaptive nature of APT28’s operations.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for UTC ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What was UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on UTC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with UTC ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view UTC's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?