Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology CommandU.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command
VS
Marine Corps RecruitingMarine Corps Recruiting
U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command

U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command

2133 Cushing St, Ft. Huachuca, 85613, US

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.NETCOM.army.mil
763/1000Fair

NETCOM leads global operations for the Army's portion of the DODIN, ensuring freedom of action in cyberspace while denying the same to our adversaries in support of multi-domain operations.

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:6,496
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marine Corps Recruiting

Marine Corps Recruiting

1, Washington, 20350, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
741/1000Moderate

This is the Official LinkedIn Page of Marine Corps Recruiting. We make Marines. We win our nation's battles. We develop quality citizens. These are the promises the Marine Corps makes to our nation and to our Marines. The core values that guide us, and the leadership...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:40,565
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command

U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marine Corps Recruiting

Marine Corps Recruiting

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marine Corps Recruiting in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marine Corps Recruiting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marine Corps Recruiting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command

U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marine Corps Recruiting

Marine Corps Recruiting

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UNI1773182377

FAQ

Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command company and Marine Corps Recruiting company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command and Marine Corps Recruiting, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command and Marine Corps Recruiting, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command or Marine Corps Recruiting ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command or Marine Corps Recruiting ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command and Marine Corps Recruiting, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command and Marine Corps Recruiting, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8