Comparison Overview
U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command

U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command
2133 Cushing St, Ft. Huachuca, 85613, US
Last Update: 29/01/2026
NETCOM leads global operations for the Army's portion of the DODIN, ensuring freedom of action in cyberspace while denying the same to our adversaries in support of multi-domain operations.

Army National Guard
111 S George Mason Dr, Arlington, 22204, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Welcome to the Army National Guard's page on LinkedIn. The Army National Guard, also known as the National Guard, is one component of The Army (which consists of the Active Army, the Army National Guard, and the Army Reserve). National Guard Soldiers serve both commun...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command







Army National Guard






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command in 2026.
Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Army National Guard in 2026.
Incident History - U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command (X = Date, Y = Severity)
U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Army National Guard (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Army National Guard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command

Army National Guard
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.