Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Urssaf Caisse nationaleUrssaf Caisse nationale
VS
State of MichiganState of Michigan
Urssaf Caisse nationale

Urssaf Caisse nationale

36, Rue de Valmy, Montreuil, 93100, FR

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
675/1000Weak

L’Urssaf est un acteur essentiel de la solidarité nationale. Aujourd’hui, nous sommes 16 000 femmes et hommes répartis sur tout le territoire, engagés pour faire vivre le modèle social français. Nos missions ? L’Urssaf collecte les cotisations des employeurs, trav...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:1,435
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

State Capitol, Lansing, Michigan, US, 48913

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

Every day the contributions and achievements of State of Michigan employees have a direct impact on over 10 million Michiganders across the state. If you're looking for a fulfilling career in state government that can make a real difference in the lives of others, you c...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:35,704
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Urssaf Caisse nationale

Urssaf Caisse nationale

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Urssaf Caisse nationale in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Michigan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Urssaf Caisse nationale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Urssaf Caisse nationale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State of Michigan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Michigan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Urssaf Caisse nationale

Urssaf Caisse nationale

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
URS1773973471
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale company and State of Michigan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale and State of Michigan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale and State of Michigan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Urssaf Caisse nationale or State of Michigan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Urssaf Caisse nationale or State of Michigan ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale and State of Michigan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Urssaf Caisse nationale and State of Michigan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8