Comparison Overview

Upwork

VS

[24]7.ai

Upwork

475 Brannan St, San Francisco, California, 94107, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.upwork.com/

Upwork is the world’s work marketplace that connects businesses with independent talent from across the globe. We serve everyone from one-person startups to large, Fortune 100 enterprises with a powerful, trust-driven platform that enables companies and talent to work together in new ways that unlock their potential. Our talent community on Upwork encompasses more than 10,000 skills in categories including website & app development, creative & design, customer support, finance & accounting, consulting, and operations.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 144,138
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

[24]7.ai

2105 S Bascom Ave, Campbell, California, US, 95008
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.247.ai/

[24]7.ai™ customer engagement solutions use conversational artificial intelligence to understand customer intent, enabling companies to create personalized, predictive, and effortless customer experiences across all channels; attract and retain customers; boost agent productivity and satisfaction; and drive revenues while lowering costs. The world’s largest and most recognizable brands use [24]7.ai intent-driven technologies to serve several hundred million visitors through billions of conversations annually, most of which are automated. The result is an order of magnitude improvement in digital adoption, customer satisfaction, and revenue growth. For more information, visit: www.247.ai. [24]7.ai is based in Campbell, California. [24]7.ai is a registered trademark of 24/7 Customer, Inc.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 11,036
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upwork.jpeg
Upwork
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/24-7-ai.jpeg
[24]7.ai
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Upwork
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
[24]7.ai
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Upwork in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for [24]7.ai in 2025.

Incident History — Upwork (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Upwork cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — [24]7.ai (X = Date, Y = Severity)

[24]7.ai cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upwork.jpeg
Upwork
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/24-7-ai.jpeg
[24]7.ai
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Upwork company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to [24]7.ai company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, [24]7.ai company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Upwork company.

In the current year, [24]7.ai company and Upwork company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither [24]7.ai company nor Upwork company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither [24]7.ai company nor Upwork company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither [24]7.ai company nor Upwork company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Upwork company nor [24]7.ai company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Upwork nor [24]7.ai holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Upwork company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to [24]7.ai company.

Upwork company employs more people globally than [24]7.ai company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Upwork nor [24]7.ai holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Upwork nor [24]7.ai holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Upwork nor [24]7.ai holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Upwork nor [24]7.ai holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Upwork nor [24]7.ai holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Upwork nor [24]7.ai holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References