Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Upstream by S&P Global EnergyUpstream by S&P Global Energy
VS
EniEni
Upstream by S&P Global Energy

Upstream by S&P Global Energy

London, GB

Last Update: 25/03/2026

View Profile

Upstream by S&P Global Energy, part of S&P Global, provides insights into all aspects of the upstream E&P market chain, from exploration to decommissioning, with comprehensive analysis of regulations and company strategies, navigating through the upstream universe of me...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Eni

Eni

Piazzale Enrico Mattei, 1, Rome, 00144, IT

Last Update: 13/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.eni.com
812/1000Good

Eni is an integrated energy company, founded in 1953, with 31.376 employees in 69 countries around the world, including Algeria, Angola, Mozambique, Mexico, Indonesia and Italy. In 2021, the company launched a new strategy that will enable it to provide a variety of ful...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:32,210
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Upstream by S&P Global Energy

Upstream by S&P Global Energy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Eni

Eni

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Upstream by S&P Global Energy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eni in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Upstream by S&P Global Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Upstream by S&P Global Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Eni (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eni cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Upstream by S&P Global Energy

Upstream by S&P Global Energy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Eni

Eni

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy company and Eni company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy and Eni, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy and Eni, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Upstream by S&P Global Energy or Eni ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Upstream by S&P Global Energy or Eni ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy and Eni, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Upstream by S&P Global Energy and Eni, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9