Comparison Overview

UPMC

VS

SARquavitae

UPMC

US Steel Tower, 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15219
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

UPMC is a world-renowned, nonprofit health care provider and insurer committed to delivering exceptional, people-centered care and community services. Headquartered in Pittsburgh and affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, UPMC is shaping the future of health through clinical and technological innovation, research, and education. Dedicated to advancing the well-being of our diverse communities, we provide nearly $2 billion annually in community benefits, more than any other health system in Pennsylvania. Our 100,000 employees — including more than 5,000 physicians — care for patients across more than 40 hospitals and 800 outpatient sites in Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland, as well as overseas. UPMC Insurance Services covers more than 4 million members, providing the highest-quality care at the most affordable price. To learn more, visit UPMC.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 39,966
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

SARquavitae

Aribau 185 Entlo. Aribau 197 Entlo. Barcelona, Barcelona 08021, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

SARquavitae, personas que cuidan a las personas SARquavitae es la mayor plataforma de España de servicios sanitarios y sociales de atención a las personas. La plantilla, formada por 12.200 profesionales, ofrece más de 10.900 plazas repartidas por todo el territorio español y atiende a unas 200.000 personas al año. La compañía dispone de 51 centros residenciales, 10 centros de atención a la discapacidad, 60 centros de día y 3 complejos de viviendas con servicios. Además, también ofrece diariamente servicio de ayuda a domicilio a más de 31.250 personas y de teleasistencia a 26.500 usuarios.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upmc.jpeg
UPMC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sarquavitae.jpeg
SARquavitae
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UPMC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SARquavitae
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPMC in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SARquavitae in 2025.

Incident History — UPMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UPMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SARquavitae (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SARquavitae cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upmc.jpeg
UPMC
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2018
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sarquavitae.jpeg
SARquavitae
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UPMC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SARquavitae company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UPMC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SARquavitae company has not reported any.

In the current year, SARquavitae company and UPMC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SARquavitae company nor UPMC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SARquavitae company nor UPMC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SARquavitae company nor UPMC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UPMC company nor SARquavitae company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UPMC nor SARquavitae holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UPMC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SARquavitae company.

UPMC company employs more people globally than SARquavitae company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither UPMC nor SARquavitae holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UPMC nor SARquavitae holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UPMC nor SARquavitae holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UPMC nor SARquavitae holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UPMC nor SARquavitae holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UPMC nor SARquavitae holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N