Comparison Overview

UPMC

VS

Atrium Health

UPMC

US Steel Tower, 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15219
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.upmc.com

UPMC is a world-renowned, nonprofit health care provider and insurer committed to delivering exceptional, people-centered care and community services. Headquartered in Pittsburgh and affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, UPMC is shaping the future of health through clinical and technological innovation, research, and education. Dedicated to advancing the well-being of our diverse communities, we provide nearly $2 billion annually in community benefits, more than any other health system in Pennsylvania. Our 100,000 employees — including more than 5,000 physicians — care for patients across more than 40 hospitals and 800 outpatient sites in Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland, as well as overseas. UPMC Insurance Services covers more than 4 million members, providing the highest-quality care at the most affordable price. To learn more, visit UPMC.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 39,966
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Atrium Health

1000 Blythe Blvd, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28203
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://atriumhealth.org/

Atrium Health, part of Advocate Health, is redefining how, when and where care is delivered. We are rethinking methods of care delivery to reach more people and bringing human kindness to every step of their health journey. Our dedication to elevating health care for every individual, every teammate and every community is unwavering. We won't stop until everyone – no matter who they are or where they come from – has the possibility to live well. And because of this, we are redefining why we exist, our purpose as an organization and how we make it happen together as one.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 29,437
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upmc.jpeg
UPMC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atrium-health-us.jpeg
Atrium Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UPMC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atrium Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPMC in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atrium Health in 2025.

Incident History — UPMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UPMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atrium Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atrium Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upmc.jpeg
UPMC
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2018
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atrium-health-us.jpeg
Atrium Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atrium Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UPMC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UPMC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Atrium Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Atrium Health company and UPMC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atrium Health company nor UPMC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atrium Health company nor UPMC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atrium Health company nor UPMC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UPMC company nor Atrium Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UPMC nor Atrium Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UPMC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Atrium Health company.

UPMC company employs more people globally than Atrium Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither UPMC nor Atrium Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UPMC nor Atrium Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UPMC nor Atrium Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UPMC nor Atrium Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UPMC nor Atrium Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UPMC nor Atrium Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References