Comparison Overview
UPMC Health Plan

UPMC Health Plan
600 Grant St, None, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US, 15219
Last Update: 19/03/2026
How can we best serve our members and the community? UPMC Health Plan responds to that question by providing Quality, Choice, Access, Service, and Value. As the second-largest health insurer in western Pa., we serve nearly half a million members and offer a full...

Great Eastern
1 Pickering Street , Singapore, 048659, SG
Last Update: 01/04/2026
For 117 years, we have been helping customers across generations by protecting, preserving and growing what matters to them. As One Great Eastern Group today, we are enabling the goals of over 15.5 million customers by taking care of their needs across life, health, wea...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UPMC Health Plan







Great Eastern






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UPMC Health Plan in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Great Eastern in 2026.
Incident History - UPMC Health Plan (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UPMC Health Plan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Great Eastern (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Great Eastern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UPMC Health Plan

Great Eastern
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.