Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of MedicineuOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine
VS
McGill UniversityMcGill University
uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine

uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine

451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8M5, CA

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

The Faculty of Medicine of the University of Ottawa is a recognized leader in medical education and biomedical research. We are dedicated to innovation in our educational programs and at the forefront of scientific research. Our commitment to international collaboration...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
McGill University

McGill University

845 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Qc, CA, H3A 2T5

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mcgill.ca/
805/1000Good

McGill University is one of Canada's best-known institutions of higher learning and one of the leading universities in the world. With students coming to McGill from some 150 countries, our student body is the most internationally diverse of any research-intensive unive...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:15,079
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine

uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
McGill University

McGill University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McGill University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - McGill University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McGill University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine

uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
McGill University

McGill University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine company and McGill University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine and McGill University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine and McGill University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine or McGill University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine or McGill University ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine and McGill University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between uOttawa | Faculté de médecine | Faculty of Medicine and McGill University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2