Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and DesignUniversity of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design
VS
Deakin UniversityDeakin University
University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design

University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design

1 Spadina Crescent, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2J5, CA

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
771/1000Fair

The John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design is a higher education institution based out of the University of Toronto in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:202
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Deakin University

Deakin University

221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, victoria, AU, 3125

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.deakin.edu.au/
755/1000Fair

Deakin’s unique identity – rooted in balanced excellence in education and research – has been driving lasting change for a better future since 1974. Over our 50+ year history, Deakin has grown to be one of the top universities worldwide with a truly global presence. Our...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:10,793
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design

University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Deakin University

Deakin University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deakin University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Deakin University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deakin University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design

University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Deakin University

Deakin University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEA3929722

FAQ

Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design company and Deakin University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design and Deakin University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design and Deakin University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design or Deakin University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design or Deakin University ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design and Deakin University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design and Deakin University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56078
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56077
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56076
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56075
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56074
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8