Comparison Overview
University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design

University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design
1 Spadina Crescent, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2J5, CA
Last Update: 30/04/2026
The John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design is a higher education institution based out of the University of Toronto in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Deakin University
221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, victoria, AU, 3125
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Deakin’s unique identity – rooted in balanced excellence in education and research – has been driving lasting change for a better future since 1974. Over our 50+ year history, Deakin has grown to be one of the top universities worldwide with a truly global presence. Our...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design







Deakin University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Deakin University in 2026.
Incident History - University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Deakin University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Deakin University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

University of Toronto - John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design

Deakin University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.