Comparison Overview

Unum

VS

Seguros SURA

Unum

1 Fountain Sq., None, Chattanooga, TN, US, 37402
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Since our founding in 1848, Unum has been a leader in the employee benefits business through innovation, integrity and an unwavering commitment to our customers. This simple philosophy has guided us through America’s fledgling insurance landscape and helped us become an international leader in financial protection benefits, offering disability, life, accident, critical illness, dental, vision and stop-loss insurance; leave and absence management support and behavioral health services.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 11,338
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Seguros SURA

Edificio Suramericana Carrera 64 B 49 A 30, Medellín, Antioquia, CO
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

SURA es una compañía que integra en diferentes empresas soluciones en seguros y seguridad social. Su marca se presenta a los clientes como Seguros SURA, ARL SURA y EPS SURA. Existen otras marcas y empresas, especialmente de prestación de servicios, que hacen parte de la Compañía. Nuestra experiencia y solidez está soportada en 80 años de trayectoria en el mercado de los seguros. Tiempo en el que hemos acompañado a los latinoamericanos en todas las etapas de la vida con productos que se ajustan a sus necesidades de protección. Para responder a nuestras promesas de aseguramiento contamos con una estructura sólida de negocios, permitiéndonos construir relaciones de largo plazo con nuestros clientes basadas en la tranquilidad de estar bien protegidos. La vida y el patrimonio económico son una prioridad para SURA, por ello ofrecemos un amplio portafolio de soluciones.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 14,276
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unum.jpeg
Unum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seguros-sura.jpeg
Seguros SURA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Unum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seguros SURA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unum in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seguros SURA in 2025.

Incident History — Unum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seguros SURA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seguros SURA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unum.jpeg
Unum
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seguros-sura.jpeg
Seguros SURA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Seguros SURA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Unum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Unum company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Seguros SURA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Seguros SURA company and Unum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seguros SURA company nor Unum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Unum company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Seguros SURA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Seguros SURA company nor Unum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Unum company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Seguros SURA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Unum nor Seguros SURA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Unum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Seguros SURA company.

Seguros SURA company employs more people globally than Unum company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Unum nor Seguros SURA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Unum nor Seguros SURA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Unum nor Seguros SURA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Unum nor Seguros SURA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Unum nor Seguros SURA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Unum nor Seguros SURA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N